APHC010320102019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 15073/2019 Between: 1. K B REDDY, K.B. REDDY, S/O. LATE MASTAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC DRIVER, E.NO.725279, APSRTC, NARASARAOPET DEPOT DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, R/O. H.NO.2-31, MERIKAPUDI, PIRANGIPURAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. G. MALLIKARJUN RAO, S/O. VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC DRIVER, E.NO.725750, APSRTC, PIDUGURALLA, NARASARAOPET DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, R/O. 4-69, JAKKAWAR STREET, MARABAVI CENTRE, NADENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. - 522 619. 3. J. VINAYAKUDU,, S/O. LATE VEERAR AGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC CONDUCTOR, E.NO.392340, APSRTC, NARASARAOPET DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, R/O. H.NO.7-209, MADHU APARTMENTS, 1ST FLOOR, BACKSIDE ASWINI THEATER, PIDUGURALLA, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 549. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE VICECHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION OF VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, GUNTUR REGION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 3. THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC, NARASARAOPET DEPOT DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. C RAJA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.15073 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate Writ, Order of direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and to declare the inaction of the respondents on the Proceedings No.L1/876(31)/2018-RM (G), dated 28.09.2018 of the 2nd respondent, for not taking any action For providing employment to the Spouse/Child of the medically unfit of the petitioners, the said action of the respondents is highly illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory and also in violation of Art. 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and declare the same as bad in law and consequently direct the respondents to provide employment to the Spouse/Child of the medically unfit of the petitioners forthwith in the existing vacancies of the respondents corporation i.e., A.P.S.R.T.C., Vijayawada and to pass…” 2. Ms.Sowmya, learned counsel representing Sri Venkateswarlu Sanisetty, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC/respondents appeared through video conference. 3. None appeared for the petitioners, though the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. There was no representation for the petitioners today, as well as on the previous adjournments i.e., on 12.08.2025 and 22.07.2025. 4 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 02.09.2025 Pmk 5 17 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:15073 OF 2019 Date: 02.09.2025 Pmk