[2025:RJ-JP:17824] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7703/2018 Babu Lal Rakshak Son Of Shri Hanuman Prasad, aged about 40 years, R/o Ward No. 2, Behind Mumtaj Hotel, Nai Sarak, Churu, Rajasthan, Presently Posted As Warden, Training Center, Bharat Scout And Guide, Jagatpura, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Commissioner, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Jaipur. 2. The State Secretary, Rajasthan State Bharat Scoute And Guide, State Head Office Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur. 3. State Training Commissioner Scout, Head Office Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur. 4. In-charge Training Center, Scout And Guide, Jagatpura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Chabba, AAG Mr. Sandeep Pathak HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 28/04/2025 1. Petitioner has preferred instant civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to grant following relief:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to call for the entire record of the case of the petitioner, examine the same, accept and allow this writ petition and by an appropriate writ, order or direction i) the respondents be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner in view of the award dated 24.10.2013 on the post of Warden/Store Keeper or other equally available post from the date of initial appointment with all consequential benefits with interest @ 18% from its became due including arrears, fixation, selection scale, promotion etc. [2025:RJ-JP:17824] (2 of 2) [CW-7703/2018] ii) The Petitioner may be awarded the minimum pay of the scale of the post held by him since 1999 with all consequential benefits. iii) The respondents may be directed not to harass and remove the petitioner from service by passing the coercive order. iv) Any other relief which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Counsel for petitioner is fair enough to admit that the prayer for regularization of Class IV employee and grant of minimum pay scale and other benefits can be made before the Labour Court. He prays that petitioner may be relegated to approach before the Labour Court to ventilate his grievance but simultaneously directions be issued to expedite his case of regularization. 3. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of respondents has no object, in case, petitioner prays for regularization and consequential benefits before the Labour Court and same, if filed, obviously shall be considered by the Labour Court, in accordance with law. 4. In view of above, without entering into merits, instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach before the Labour Court for ventilating his grievances as raised herein this writ petition. 5. Needless to observe that if any such petition is filed by the petitioner, the Labour Court shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law as early as possible. 6. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /115