HEMANT YADAV S/O DURGAPRASAD v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8185/2025 · 2025-08-04
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22669 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22669 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29838] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8185/2025 Hemant Yadav S/o Durgaprasad, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Block-E, House No. 807, Behind Gupta Store Vaishali Nagar, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur District Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Beawar District Beawar). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arpit Srivastava, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 04/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.235/2025 registered at Police Station Beawar City, District Beawar for the offences punishable under Sections 308(2) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He contends that charge-sheet has already been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody 28.05.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
[2025:RJ-JP:29838] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8185/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Hemant Yadav S/o Durgaprasad shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/263