Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22668 (AP)

Chinta Srinivasa Rao v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/14950/2019 · 2025-08-13

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010320512019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14950/2019 Between: 1. CHINTA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, HINDU, AGED 44 YEARS, MPHA MALE,(CONTRACT EMPLOYEE) RIO DOOR NO. 21-5-42/7, 3RD LINE, SAI NAGER, SATTENAPALLI ROAD, NARASARAOPET TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL 3. STATION ROUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET RURAL POLICE STATION 4. GANGINENI KOTAIAH, S/O ROASAIAH HINDU, 60 YEARS CULTIVATION RIO DOOR NO. 1-206, MATAM BAZAR, MULAKALURU POST, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. GANGINENI PADMAVATHI, W/O KOTAIAH, HINDU, 55 YEARS CULTIVATION RIO DOOR NO. 1-206, MATAM BAZAR, MULAKALURU POST, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 6. GANGINENI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O KOTAIAH, HINDU, 32 YEARS CULTIVATION RIO DOOR NO. 1-206, MATAM BAZAR, MULAKALURU POST, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3 rd respondent in interfering with the civil matters and summoning the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to summon the petitioners without there being a crime registered against them and specifically direct them not to interfere in civil matter IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to summon the petitioner without there being a crime registered against him and specifically direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in civil matter Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. M JANARDHAN RAO 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14950 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 06.08.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that the preliminary enquiry of the Police would reveal that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is of civil in nature and therefore, they will not interfere in such civil dispute. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 14.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14950 of 2019 Date: 14.08.2025 PSA