SHIVBHOLE @ RAJKUMAR AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/6108/2025 · 2025-05-04
Vikas Budhwar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22666 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22666 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72067 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 6108 of 2025 Applicant :- Shivbhole @ Rajkumar And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Neha Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
1. Heard Ms. Neha Khan, learned counsel for the applicants as well as Sri Vikas Sharma, learned State Law Officer for the State.
2. This application u/s 528 of BNSS has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of Complaint No. 125 of 2023 (Pushpa Prajapati @ Bachchi Devi Vs. Shivbhole @ Rajkumar and others) Under Section 498-A, 323 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Kaushambi, District Kaushambi, as well as impugned summoning order dated 18.12.2023 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaushambi.
3. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicants is that the applicant No. 1 is the husband, applicant no. 2 is the father-in- law, applicant no. 3 is the mother-in-law, applicant no. 4 is Married Nanad and applicant no. 5 is Nandoi of the opposite party no. 2.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that though the applicants have obtained bail. She, as per the instructions, submits that the applicants shall be moving appropriate application for discharge.
4. In view of the above, the present application stands consigned to record leaving it open to the applicants to prefer appropriate for discharge and, in case, such application is preferred, this Court has no reason to disbelieve that the same shall be given a logical end strictly in accordance with law of the land.
Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Rajesh Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad