Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22663 (RAJ)

RAM RATAN S/O SHRI LAKHA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9796/2025 · 2025-07-04

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24729] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9796/2025 1. Ram Ratan S/o Shri Lakha, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nagal Panditpura, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt Kotputli-Behror,(Raj.). 2. Indraraj S/o Shri Lakha, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nagal Panditpura, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt Kotputli-Behror,(Raj.). 3. Dayaram S/o Shri Lakha, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nagal Panditpura, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt Kotputli-Behror,(Raj.). 4. Girdhari S/o O Shri Lakha, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nagal Panditpura, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt Kotputli-Behror,(Raj.). 5. Bhagtawar S/o Dhanshi, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nagal Panditpura, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt Kotputli-Behror,(Raj.). 6. Hariram S/o Dhanshi, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nagal Panditpura, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt Kotputli-Behror,(Raj.). 7. Sitaram S/o Dhanshi, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nagal Panditpura, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt Kotputli-Behror,(Raj.). 8. Dataram S/o Dhanshi, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nagal Panditpura, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt Kotputli-Behror,(Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. 3. The S.d.o., Kotputli, District Kotputli- Behror. 4. The Tehsildar-Cum-Managing Officer (Custodian), Kotputli, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Ram Kishan Sharma [2025:RJ-JP:24729] (2 of 3) [CW-9796/2025] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar & Ms. Pooja Dixit for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 04/07/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction to enter the name of the petitioners in Revenue record as per direction given by this court in SBCWP No. 1878/1982 [Ishwar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] decided on 30.03.1993. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that this Court has subsequently also directed the authority to pass appropriate orders in respect of conferment of right of entries in the Revenue record and as such counsel refers order passed by this Court in SBCWP No. 2801/2007 [Sadhu Ram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] decided on 05.08.2008. 3. Learned counsel has further referred orders passed by this Court in SBCWP No.13958/2009 [Heeralal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] decided on 17.11.2009, SBCWP No.14794/2016 [Leela Ram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] and other connected writ petitions decided by a common order dt.25.10.2017 and SBCWP No.6619/2015 [Kailash & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] decided on 19.11.2015. 4. This Court finds that earlier writ petitions decided by this Court has permitted the persons to approach the respondents and they were to submit fresh application and then the authorities [2025:RJ-JP:24729] (3 of 3) [CW-9796/2025] were required to decide such representations by keeping in mind the order passed in the case of Ishwar & Ors. (supra). 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid legal position and submits that the petitioners are required to approach the authorities again by submitting fresh application. 6. The present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to approach the respondents by filing a fresh application for conferment of their right and the respondents are directed to decide the said representation by keeping in mind the decision passed by this Court in SBCWP No. 1878/1982 [Ishwar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] (supra) and subsequent decisions. 7. In case, the petitioners file representation within a period of two weeks, the same may be decided by the respondents in expeditious manner but in no case later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 8. Stay applications and all application(s) (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /130