Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22660 (RAJ)

JAYANT SINGH S/O TEJ SINGH FAUZDAR v. STATE OF RAJ.

CW/9769/2025 · 2025-07-07

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24882] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9769/2025 1. Jayant Singh S/o Tej Singh Fauzdar, Aged About 32 Years, Vijay Nagar, Saras Circle Agra Road, Bharatpur, Raj. 321001 2. Deepak S/o Late Gulab Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No 8, Kasoda, PO: Kasoda, District Bharatpur Raj. 321026. 3. Devrat Sharma S/o Govind Sharan Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, Shyam Shiksha Sadan, Nem Da Gate, Bharatpur, PO: Bharatpur, Raj. 321001 4. Naveen Kumar Gaur S/o J.P. Gaur, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 1-F-22, S.T.C Housing Board, Bharatpur, Raj. 321001 5. Uma Kumari W/o Rahul Dev Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Mukhena, Bharatpur, Raj. 321642 6. Divya Kumar S/o Sunil Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 19, S M Bihar, Singhal Oil Mil Ke Pichhe, Shiv Nagar, Bharatpur, Raj. 321001 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Raj., Through Director Medical & Health Department of Principle Secretary Secretariat Jaipur. Raj. 2. Director Medical And Health Department Of Raj., Jaipur 3. Director Medical And Health Department Of Raj., Jaipur (Non-Gazetted) 4. Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Bharatpur Raj. 5. Superintendent And Chief Medical Officer, State College Of Medical Sciences And Affiliated Hospital Bharatpur Raj. 6. Medical Superintendent Shri Jagannath Pahadia Medical College Affiliated Hospital Group, Bharatpur. Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asvani Kumar with Mr. Saurabh Sharma and Mr. Aditya Bhatt For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:24882] (2 of 3) [CW-9769/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 07/07/2025 Although, this writ petition is filed for quashing the order dated 31.05.2025 whereby, the petitioners, working as Pharmacists on urgent temporary basis, have been relieved from the services on account of expiry of the contractual period but, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they would feel contented if they are permitted to submit representation(s) with the respondents to consider their case in the light of an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 27.05.2025 passed in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.11074/2025. In the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra), this Court observed as under:- “Be that as it may, the petitioners may file their representation(s) with the concerned Chief Medical and Health Officers for redressal of their grievances. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider engagement/continuous of the petitioners on the post of Pharmacist, in case they feel that the services of the petitioners are required by them. The present writ petitions stand disposed of, accordingly. The stay applications also stand disposed of, accordingly.” [2025:RJ-JP:24882] (3 of 3) [CW-9769/2025] Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:- 1. The petitioners are at liberty to submit representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. 2. The respondents are directed to consider the representation(s) within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt in the light of observation made by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra). Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/68