Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 226598 (MAD)

Kannan v. Thangammal

REV.APLW(MD)/215/2025 · 2025-10-24

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

REV.APLW(MD). No.215 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 24.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY REV.APLW(MD). No.215 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.22952 & 22953 of 2025 Kannan ... Petitioner Vs 1. Thangammal 2. The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 3. The Tahsildar, Kulathur Taluk Office, Keeranur, Pudukkottai District. 4. The Firka Surveyor, Kulathur Taluk Office, Keeranur, Pudukkottai District. 5. The Inspector of Police, Iluppur Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APLW(MD). No.215 of 2025 6. The Village Administrative Officer, O/o.The Village Administrative Officer, Vellanur, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents PRAYER : This Review Application filed under Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code, to review the order dated 09.09.2025 passed in WP(MD).No. 24267 of 2025 and dispose the writ petition on merits and thus render justice. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pagalavan For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate for R2 to R4 & R6 Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R5 ORDER This review petition relates to an order dated 09.09.2025 in W.P. (MD) No. 24267 of 2025. Learned counsel for the review applicant submits that a survey was carried out without considering the objections of the review applicant. 2. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 2 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APLW(MD). No.215 of 2025 to 4 and 6 and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice for the fifth respondent. On instructions, learned Government Advocate states that the survey has not been conducted till date. He also states that only notice was issued in relation to the application for survey. 3. In these facts and circumstances, no case is made out to review the earlier order. Nonetheless, as directed therein, the third and fourth respondents herein are directed to issue notice to the petitioner and the owners of relevant adjacent lands and consider their objections before taking a decision on the request of the first respondent herein for a survey. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 24.10.2025 apd To 1. The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 2. The Tahsildar, Kulathur Taluk Office, 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APLW(MD). No.215 of 2025 Keeranur, Pudukkottai District. 3. The Firka Surveyor, Kulathur Taluk Office, Keeranur, Pudukkottai District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Iluppur Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 5. The Village Administrative Officer, O/o.The Village Administrative Officer, Vellanur, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APLW(MD). No.215 of 2025 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J apd ORDER MADE IN REV.APLW(MD) No.215 of 2025 Date : 24.10.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis