APHC010319112020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21121/2020 Between: 1. .REDDEM TIRUPATHI REDDY, FATHER NAME S/O.VENKATESWARA REDDY, AGE 40 ADDRESS R/O.DOOR NO.8-133-9, APPAIAH GARI STREET, KANIGIRI TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. GUJJULA VENKATA REDDY, FATHER NAME S/O.NAGI REDDY AGE 48 ADDRESS R/O DOOR NO.8-124, KASI REDDY STREET, KOTHAPETA, KANIGIRI TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. YELURI NAGESWARA RAO, FATHER NAME S/O.CHENCHAIAH, AGE 51 ADDRESS R/O.DOOR NO.9-203, NEELAKANTAM VARI STREET, KANIGIRI TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANIGIRI CIRCLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANIGIRI POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2 5. K VENKATESWARA RAO, ADDRESS S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY WORKING AS INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANIGIRI POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. ADDANKI RANGA BABU, ADDRESS S/O.PEDA RANGANAYAKULU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.DOOR NO.11/130, 8TH WARD, APPAIAH GARI STREET, KANIGIR TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a Writ order or Orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamous declaring the action of the respondents No.3 to 5 in interfereing in the civil disputes between the pettiioners and the respondent No.6, in connection with the Management and financial affairs of Sri Pavithra Function Hall, situated Opp.R.T.C Bus Stand Kanigiri, is being illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art.14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.3 to 5, not to interfere in the civil disputes between the pettiioners and the respondent No.6, in connection with the Management and financial affairs of Sri Pavithra Function Hall, situated Opp.R.T.C Bus Stand Kanigiri, in any manner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 to 5, not to interfere in the civil disputes between the pettiioners and the respondent No.6, in connection with the Management and financial affairs of Sri Pavithra Function Hall, situated Opp.R.T.C Bus Stand Kanigiri, in any manner pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. G VENKATA REDDY 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a Writ order or Orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamous declaring the action of the respondents No.3 to 5 in interfereing in the civil disputes between the pettiioners and the respondent No.6, in connection with the Management and financial affairs of Sri Pavithra Function Hall, situated Opp.R.T.C Bus Stand Kanigiri, is being illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art.14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.3 to 5, not to interfere in the civil disputes between the pettiioners and the respondent No.6, in connection with the Management and financial affairs of Sri Pavithra Function Hall, situated Opp.R.T.C Bus Stand Kanigiri, in any manner and pass…” 2. Heard Sri Madhava Rao Nalluri, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the respondent No.6. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in view of the interim order dated 11.11.2020, passed by this Court, the police are not interfering in the civil dispute relating to partnership business between the petitioners and the 6th respondent and the writ petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 01.09.2025 MH 5 6 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 251 WRIT PETITION NO: 21121/2020 Dt.01.09.2025 MH