RAMJAGI YADAV ALIAS JAGGU ALIAS RAMJAG YADAV v. STATE OF U.P.
BAIL/6790/2025 · 2025-04-21
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22655 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22655 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:60616 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6790 of 2025 Applicant :- Ramjagi Yadav Alias Jaggu Alias Ramjag Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused- applicant, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 133 of 2024, under Sections 221, 132, 310(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Balua, District Chandauli during the pendency of trial.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent person and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. The applicant is not named in the FIR. His name came into picture on the statement of driver of Scorpio. It is submitted that there are three criminal history of the applicant which has been explained in the supplementary affidavit. It is also submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 17.01.2025. The charge sheet has been filed on 23.01.2025. It is further submitted that recovery was made from the co-accused Harsh @ Golu Yadav who has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.10.2024. There are no recovery from the present applicant. The applicant is on better footing from Harsh @ Golu Yadav. It is next submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed on 23.01.2025 after completion of the investigation.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail but could not deny the submissions advanced by
learned counsel for the applicant.
4. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
5. It is admitted fact that no recovery was made from the present applicant. The applicant is in jail since 17.01.2025 and charge-
sheet has been filed. The co-accused Harsh @ Golu Yadav has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.10.2024. The applicant has given undertaking that he shall abide by all terms and conditions imposed by this Court while granting the bail. Taking into consideration all entirety of the matter as discussed above, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. The bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Ramjagi Yadav @ Jaggu @ Ramjag Yadav who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release
order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence. (ii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 B.N.S.S. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Pratima Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad