Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22653 (HP)

BHUPINDER SINGH v. MINAKSHI BHARDWAJ

CMP.M/1552/2024 · 2025-01-03

Rakesh Kainthla, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Bhupinder Singh Vs. Minakshi Bhardwaj CMP(M) No. 1552 of 2024 03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Nitin Rishi, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Surinder K. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. CMP(M) No. 1552 of 2024 Mr. Surinder K. Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent. Even though, the application filed by the applicant has been opposed by the respondent, however, for the reasons stated in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay. Ordered accordingly. The delay of 23 days’ in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Appeal be registered. FAO(FC) No. 01 of 2025 Call for the records. CMP No. 300 of 2025 Be registered. Notice. Mr. Surinder K. Sharma, Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is granted six weeks’ time to file reply. Since the respondent, prima facie, appears to be earning more than the applicant/appellant, therefore, the order dated 6.7.2024, passed by the trial Court is ordered to be stayed. List on 21st March, 2025. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 3rd January, 2025 (Nikita/Chander)