Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010294512023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/69/2025 1: KAMAL KUMARI DEORI AND 4 ORS. D/O JOGEN DEORI, VILL. BANDARDEWA, MOUZA- NARAYANPUR, KHERAJKHAT CIRCLE, NARAYANPUR REVENUE CIRCLE, P.O. AND P.S- BANDARDEWA, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM. 2: ANNADA DEORI W/O N.M. SINGHA DEORI VILL. BANDARDEWA MOUZA- NARAYANPUR KHERAJKHAT CIRCLE NARAYANPUR REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. AND P.S- BANDARDEWA DIST.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM. 3: BHANTI DEORI W/O BALABAN DEORI VILL. BANDARDEWA MOUZA- NARAYANPUR KHERAJKHAT CIRCLE NARAYANPUR REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. AND P.S- BANDARDEWA DIST.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM. 4: PANKAJ DEORI S/O PULEN DEORI VILL. BANDARDEWA MOUZA- NARAYANPUR KHERAJKHAT CIRCLE NARAYANPUR REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. AND P.S- BANDARDEWA DIST.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM. 5: PRIYABAR DEORI D/O JOGEN DEORI VILL. BANDARDEWA MOUZA- NARAYANPUR KHERAJKHAT CIRCLE NARAYANPUR REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. AND P.S- BANDARDEWA DIST.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS 1: THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR G-5 AND 6 SECTOR- 10 DWARKA NEW DELHI- 110075. 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM P.W.D. (ROADS) DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI- 6. Page No.# 2/2 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LAKHIMPUR P.O. AND P.S.- LAKHIMPUR DIST.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN- 787001. 5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER P.W.D. BUILDING DIVISIONS DIST.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN- 787052. 6:THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER P.W.D. BUILDING DIVISION DIST.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM For the Appellant(s) : None. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Boro, Advocate for respondent No.2. : Mr. D. Nath, Standing Counsel, PWD for respondent Nos.3, 5 & 6. – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 28.07.2025 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ) Nobody appears on behalf of the appellants. Mr. R. Boro, learned Advocate for the respondent No.2 and Mr. D. Nath, learned Standing Counsel, PWD for the respondent Nos.3, 5 & 6 are though present. It appears from the records that the learned counsel for the appellants has not been appearing in this matter on successive dates. He perhaps has lost interest in the matter. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant