Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22650 (JHR)

GUDDU MAHTO ALIAS TUSHAR SOURABH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5586/2024 · 2025-04-16

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:11642 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5586 of 2024 ------ Guddu Mahto @ Tushan Sourabh, son of Late Khirodhar Mahto, resident of Village Sadma Kala, Bhelwatand, P.O. & P.S. Petarbar, District Bokaro; … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, A.P.P. ----- 05/ 16.04.2025 This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Petarwar P.S. Case No.149 of 2023, for offences under Sections 302 and 34 IPC. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned S.D.J.M. Bermo at Tenughat. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party – State. 3. Opportunity was granted to the State to oppose the anticipatory bail, which the State availed and opposed. 4. There is an allegation that this petitioner along with other persons assaulted the deceased with bricks when a boundary wall was being constructed. The father of the informant who is the deceased, became unconscious and later on died on the spot. 5. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3