Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22649 (CHH)

SUNIL YADAV @ SANIL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/293/2025 · 2025-06-17

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:25338-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 293 of 2025 1 - Sunil Yadav @ Sanil S/o Shri Dharmendra Yadav Aged About 26 Years R/o Village- Pandara Pathara, Police Outpost- Belgahna Police Station- Kota, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Home (Jail) Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director General Of Prisons And Correctional Services Chhattisgarh Head Quarter- Prisons And Correctional Services Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The District Magistrate District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Jail Superintendent Central Jail Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rishi Rahul Soni, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.06.19 10:56:56 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 18/06/2025 1. Heard Mr. Rishi Rahul Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondents/ State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to this case from possession of the respondents for it's kind perusal; 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a suitable writ, order or direction commanding the respondent no.3 to consider and decide the application (Annexure P/1) preferred by the petitioner under C.G. Prisoners Leave Rule 1989 as early as possible preferably within a period of 15 days or within any other suitable period; 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that the order has been passed on 13/06/2025 and pursuant to the said order, the applicant has been released on parole on 16/06/2025. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not objected the aforesaid submission made by the State counsel. 5. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of. - Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice $ Bhilwar/ Rahul