- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16905-DB WA No. 609 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT APPEAL NO. 609 OF 2021 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. ASHA B.M D/O B MANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT TEACHER, SRI. THIRTHALIGESHWARA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, BELAGUTTI, NYAMATHI, HONNALI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 218. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GANAPATHI, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE DIRECTOR SECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC IINSTRUCTIONS DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, DAVANAGERE-577 001 Digitally signed by MAYAGAIAH VINUTHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16905-DB WA No. 609 of 2021 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER HONNALI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 217 5. THE NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY (R) BALARAJ URS ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201 REP BY ITS SECRETARY 6. THE HEAD MASTER SRI. THIRTHALINGESHWARA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, BELAGUTTI, HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 201 7. GOPAL M S/O SRI. MASTEPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, WORKING AS TEMPORARY TEACHER, SRI. THEERATHALINGESHWARA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, BELAGUTTI, HONNALLI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 001 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14-4-2021 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT PETITION NO.24509/2018(S-RES) AND ALLOW THIS WRIT APPEAL, CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16905-DB WA No. 609 of 2021 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) There is no representation for the appellant even on the second call. 2. Even though this appeal is listed for seventh time for compliance of office objections today and in spite of granting sufficient opportunity, learned counsel for the appellant failed to comply the office objections. In such circumstances, it could be gathered that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22