THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. CHAKRADHAR YADAV
MCC/535/2025 · 2025-06-11
Shri Parth Prateem Sahu
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22638 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22638 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:23307
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 535 of 2025 1 - The New India Insurance Company Limited Divisional Office Rama Trade Center Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
... Appellant Versus 1 - Chakradhar Yadav S/o Aasharam Yadav Aged About 18 Years R/o- Mahamayapara Lormi District- Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) (Claimant) 2 - Virendra Singh S/o Kanhaiya Singh Rajput Aged About 32 Years R/o Village- Gandhidih Ward No. 11, Lormi District- Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) (Driver) 3 - Yashwant Singh S/o Shobharam Rajput Aged About 38 Years Permanent R/o- Mahaveer Ward Majgaon Lormi District- Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) (Owner)
... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Samir Singh, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 12/06/2025
1. This MCC is filed by the applicants seeking correction of the typographical error in the impugned order dated 25.03.2025 passed in MAC No. 657/2020 pointing out that while computing the amount awarded on different heads by this Court, but due to typographical error has directed to pay the compensation of Rs. 1,78,155/- instead of Rs. 1,68,155/-. Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his contention referred to the Paragraphs No. 13 and 14 of the order. SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY
2
2. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the order placed along with the MCC.
3. This court while allowing the MAC No. 657/2020 in part had awarded Rs. 1,13,155/- towards the medical expenses, Rs. 40,000/- towards pains and sufferings and Rs. 10,000/- towards special diet and Rs. 5,000/- towards attendant. The total sum of the aforementioned award would come to Rs. 1,68,155/- (1,13,155 + 40,000 + 10,000 + 5,000).
4. Looking to the fact that there is a typographical error in the impugned award with respect to the total sum of award of compensation and therefore, the compensation as mentioned in para 14 of the order of Rs. 1,78,155/- be read as Rs. 1,68,155/-. It is ordered accordingly.
5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this MCC is disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey