Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22637 (KAR)

MR. SEENAPPA B v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/10632/2025 · 2025-06-11

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19990 WP No. 10632 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.10632 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: MR. SEENAPPA B. S/O DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT NO.11, 21ST CROSS 4TH STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, AGRAHARA DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560079. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KARTHIK C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AMBEDKAR VEEDHI SAMPANGI RAMA NAGAR BENGALURU- 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT KEMPEGOWDA ROAD BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVANA BENGALURU- 560009. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19990 WP No. 10632 of 2025 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION FOR CONVERSION DATED 03.08.2024 MADE BY THE PETITIONER WITH RESPECT TO SY NO. 149/8 OF BHEEMANAKUPPE VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, VIDE ANNEXURE-E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to consideration the application dated 03.08.2024 (Annexure-E) made by the petitioner, seeking conversion of the land. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State submitted that, if - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19990 WP No. 10632 of 2025 the petitioner files an application through online, seeking conversion of land in question, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. 4. In that view of the matter, petitioner is permitted to make online application and in the event if such online application is made by the petitioner, it is open for the respondents to consider the same at the earliest, in accordance with law. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69