APHC010319202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6602 OF 2025 RAO Between: 1. J YOBU, S/o Jayaraj aged about 60 HA/V, Gudipala Mandal, Chittoor District. 2. Ram Dekepak Yobu @ Ram Deepak Yobu„ r R/o. D.No. 6-37/1, Rasanapalli H/W, Gudipala Mandal years, R/o. D.No. 6-37/1, Rasanapalli S/o. J. Yobu, aged 22 years , Chittoor District. ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED N0.2 & 3 AND 1. The State of AP, Pradesh, At Amaravati. rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra ...RESPONDENT Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds ^ may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, Proh. and Excise Station. Chittoor Urban, Chittoor District to release of Criminal Petition, the High Court the petitioners/Accused No.2 & 3 in connection with Crime No. 83/2025 of Proh. and Excise Station, Chittoor Urban, Chittoor District on bail in the event of their arrest i 9 This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri D.PURNACHANDRA REDDY Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent The Court made the following ORDER ; APHC010319202025 ^ 0^0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA at amaravati (Special Original Jurisdiction) eleventh day of JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE CRIMINAL PETITION Mr>- PRADESH 0 [3369] FIVE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO 6602/2026 Between; ' mIZl,Th“d°str°ict'''" h/w, GUDIPALA 2. RAM DEKEPAK YOBU @ RAM DEEPAK 22 YEARS, R/0. D.NO. YOBU,, S/0. J. YOBU, AGED RASANAPALLI H/W 6-37/1, MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. GUDIPALA ■..PETITI0NER/ACCUSED{S) AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Pradesh, At Amaravati. of Andhra ■..respondent/complainant Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 praying that in the circumstances stated i Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased Proh. and Excise Station, Chittoor Urban petitioners/Accused No.2 & 3 on bail in the ’ with Crime No. 83/2025 of Proh. District and to of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS in the Memorandum of Grounds to direct the Station House Officer, Chittoor District to release event of their arrest in connection and Excise Station. Chittoor Urban of the ■ Chittoor pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following; 9 ORDER:- The Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code Procedure, 1973 grant anticipatory bail i Excise Station, Chittoor Urban District. A case has been offence punishable u/Sec.7(B) Amendment Act, 2020. The case of the prosecution is that: of Criminal is filed on behalf of the petitioners/accused Nos.2 & 3 to in connection with Crime No.83/2025 of Prohibition & 2) registered against the petitioners r/w 8(A), 8(C)(a) of herein for the A.P.(Prohibition) 3) On 02.06.2025 at about 5.30 P.M., preparation of illicitly distilled liquor, the Prohibition Chittoor Urban, along with their Gurralamitta area, Gudipala Mandal, on reliable information about illegal and Excise Sub-Inspector, staff and mediators, conducted a raid at were found On seeing the officials from a removed the tubes and escaped on a motorcycle. The police caught A1 at the spot and seized two black rubber tubes containing 30 liters drums with 400 liters of fermented i liquor. where the accused A1 to A3 near a ZR vehicle with two black rubber tubes, distance, A2 ran away into the bushes and A3 of ID liquor and also found blue plastic jaggery wash meant for making illicit 4) Heard. Perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case against the petitioners is based on the suspicion and requested the Court to enlarge them on bail. 6) Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed to grant bail and also on instructions submitted that the petitioner No.l has got 2 antecedents and petitioner No.2 has got 3 antecedents. A perusal of the occurrence report shows that names of the petitioners have been mentioned and even according to the prosecution's case, on seeing the police the petitioners absconded from the scene of offence. As such, it cannot be said that the case is based on suspicion. Considering the above facts, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. 7) 8) SD/- G.HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The SHO, Proh & Excise Station Chittor Urban Chittor District. 2. One CC to SRI. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies TAC 0 HIGH COURT DATED;11/07/2025 ORDER CRLP NO. 6602 OF 2025 ov 25 SEP 2025 ml ^ . Current section ^ DISMISSING THE CRLP PETITION