Settipalli Yellamma Devi, v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/21074/2020 · 2025-08-31
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22630 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22630 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010318582020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21074/2020 Between:
1. SETTIPALLI YELLAMMA DEVI,, W/O. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. BHOGYAMPALLI VILLAGE, RAYACHOTI MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA. DISTRICT, KADAPA.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAYACHOTI, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAYACHOTICIRCLE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAYACHOTI POLICE STATION, RAYACHOTI, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2
1. GP FOR HOME
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21074 of 2020 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Police Authorities in not taking any action against the petitioner's complaint and not registering any F.I.R on the petitioner's complaint is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2ndrespondent to take necessary action against the petitioners complaint and register the same as F.I.R and pass.…”
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance.
4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 01.09.2025. UPS
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.21074 of 2020
Dated.01.09.2025
UPS
17