Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22626 (RAJ)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS v. J M D SYNDICATE PVT AND ORS

CW/8009/2009 · 2025-02-13

Sudesh Bansal

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6337] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8009/2009 1. Union Of India Through Senior Division Engineer, North Western Railway, Jaipur 2. Chairman, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi 3. General Manager, Western Railway, Church Gate, Mumbai 4. Regional Rail Manager, Western Railway, Jaipur 5. Senior Regional Commercial Superintendent, Western Railway, Jaipur 6. Senior Division Engineer, Western Railway, Jaipur 7. Station Superintendent, Western Railway, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. Jaipur Mineral Development Syndicate Pvt. Ltd., Dausa Through Chief Executing Officer, Shri Sunil B 2. Additional District Judge Fast Track, Bandikui, Head Office Dausa, District Dausa Rajasthan 3. Civil Judge J.D., Dausa ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Alok Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. T.C. Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 13/02/2025 1. Instant civil writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was preferred by petitioner, feeling aggrieved by dismissal of their application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC seeking to vary the order of temporary injunction dated 20.09.2006 passed in favour of respondent-plaintiff. 2. It has been informed that during course of instant writ petition, the original suit filed by respondent-plaintiff itself has been dismissed on merits vide judgment dated 13.05.2014 and in [2025:RJ-JP:6337] (2 of 2) [CW-8009/2009] that view, the writ petition has become infructuous. The copy of judgment dated 13.05.2014 is taken on record. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. 4. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /101