ASHWANI KUMAR KUSHWAH SON OF SHRI RAMKUMAR KUSHWAH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3788/2025 · 2025-07-29
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22625 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22625 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:28650] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3788/2025 Ashwani Kumar Kushwah Son Of Shri Ramkumar Kushwah, Resident Of Sasedi, Karauli (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Inspector General Of Police, Bharatpur.
4. Superintendent Of Police, Karauli.
5. Station House Officer, Police Station Mamchari, District Karauli.
6. Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali, District Karauli.
7. Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar, Karauli, District Karauli.
8. Rajesh Son Of Murari, R/o Bagichi, Sasedi, Karauli.
9. Makhan Son Of Jugal, R/o Bagichi, Sasedi, Karauli.
10. Ashish Son Of Ramkumar, R/o Shikarganj, Chauraha, Karauli.
11. Akash Son Of Ramkumar, R/o Nai Anaj Mandi Ke Samne, Megzin Kailadevi Road, Karauli.
12. Hari Shankar Son Of Johari, R/o Shikarganj, Chauraha, Karauli.
13. Jagdish Son Of Narayan, R/o Nai Anaj Mandi Ke Samne, Megzin Kailadevi Road, Karauli.
14. Indralal Sain Son Of Unknown, R/o Patri, Gomati Colony, Karauli.
15. Jairam Son Of Hari, R/o Badalpur, Karauli.
16. Guman Singh Son Of Pyare Lal Mali, R/o Ata Karauli. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3451/2025
1. Rajesh S/o Murari, Aged About 99 Years, R/o Bagichi Sasedi, Karauli Saddar, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
[2025:RJ-JP:28650] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3788/2025]
2. Ashish S/o Ram Kumar Mali, R/o Shikarganj Chouraha, Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
3. Jayram Mali S/o Hari Mali, R/o Badalpur, Karauli Sadar, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
4. Akash S/o Ramkumar Mali, R/o Opp. New Anaj Mandi, Magzin Kaildevi Road, Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
5. Guman Singh S/o Pyarelal Mali, R/o Ata, Karauli Sadar, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
6. Jagdish S/o Narayan, R/o Opp. New Anaj Mandi, Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
7. Makhan S/o Jugalkishor, R/o Bagichi Sasedi, Karauli Sadar, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
8. Harishankar S/o Johari, R/o Shikar Ganj Chouraha, Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
9. Indra Lal S/o Nathuyaram, R/o Village Patari, Karauli, Presently Residing At Gomti Colony, Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Ashwani Kumar Kushwah S/o Ram Kumar Kushwah, R/o Sasedi, Karauli Sadar, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Kushwah, present in person (in SBCRLMP No. 3788/2025) Mr. Sharvan Saini Mr. Manish K. Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Lokesh Sonwal, SP Karauli through VC Mr. Abhijeet, SHO, Mamchari, Karauli HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 29/07/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:28650] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-3788/2025] Upon interaction with the petitioner-Ashwani Kumar Kushwah, present in person, the concerned SP and Investigating Officer, it is deduced that instant matters pertain to matrimonial dispute, wherein cross FIRs are made to be registered by the petitioner’s wife and family members of the petitioner-Ashwani Kumar Kushwah including real brothers and cousins. In view of the above-said submissions, this Court is of the opinion that investigation be carried out under the supervision of concerned Superintendent of Police, in a fair and impartial manner. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the matters, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the present matters as matters as the same pertain to matrimonial dispute with disputed set of
facts, and the same can only be adjudicated upon trial. It is made clear that no coercive be taken against the petitioners in SBCRLMP No. 3451/2025 as it is stated that they were acting merely as mediators to settle the matrimonial dispute and they are being wrongfully implicated. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of, with aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand
disposed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /157-158