Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22624 (RAJ)

SHIVJILAL @ SHYOJI SON OF GOPI CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8139/2025 · 2025-08-18

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32263] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8139/2025 Shivjilal @ Shyoji Son Of Gopi Chand, Resident Of Bhanwarsagar, Police Station Baroni, District Tonk (At Present Confined In District Jail Tonk District Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Jain and Mr. Vaibhav Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 18/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.455/2024 registered at Police Station Baroni, District Tonk for the offence(s) under Sections 191(3), 115(2), 126(2), 109(2) and 303(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the injuries sustained to injured Chandanmal Verma were not dangerous to life. There was no murderous intention in the part of the petitioner and the co-accused. There is no specific attribution about causing injuries to the injured Chandanmal Verma. The allegations against the petitioner are omnibus in nature. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 29.05.2025 and trial/investigation of the case may take [2025:RJ-JP:32263] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8139/2025] considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused-petitioner along with the other co-accused assaulted the injured Chandanmal Verma and Chandanmal Verma sustained grievous injury at his parietal bone and also at other body parts, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the period of incarceration and so also the injury report of the injured Chandanmal Verma, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Shivjilal @ Shyoji Son Of Gopi Chand, in connection with FIR No.455/2024 registered at Police Station Baroni, District Tonk, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/114