[2025:RJ-JP:13464] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9600/2014 Iqbal Mohammad Son Of Haji Kesharji Chobdar, aged about 45 years, R/o Dundlod, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through The Commissioner, Excise Department, Rajasthan, Udaipur Rajasthan. 2. The Additional Commissioner, Excise Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The District Excise Officer, Mandawa Road, Near Police Chowki, Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. 4. Gafoor Khan Son Of Idu Khan, r/o Dundlod, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lakhan Sharma for Mr. Prahlad Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jayvardhan Joshi for Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 25/03/2025 1. Instant writ petition was disposed of by the Co-ordinate Bench of this High Court vide order dated 15.12.2014, issuing directions to the respondents to ensure handing over the possession of lands in question to the petitioner who claimed himself to be purchaser of the lands in the auction made by respondents. However, perusal of the record indicates that the order dated 15.12.2014 was reviewed and recalled vide order dated [2025:RJ-JP:13464] (2 of 2) [CW-9600/2014] 19.02.2016 on filing S.B. Civil Review Petition No.253/2015 on the ground that the review petitioners had purchased the land in question from the private respondent No.4-Gafoor Khan through registered sale deed way back on 04.10.1982 and they were not impleaded as party-respondent in the present writ petition. Hence, while reviewing/ recalling order dated 15.12.2014, the writ petitioners were directed to implead the review petitioners as party-respondents in the present writ petition. 2. It is apparent from the record that despite giving directions by this Court vide order dated 19.02.2016, the review petitioners who are purchasers of the lands in question through registered sale deed dated 04.10.1982 have not been impleaded as party- respondents in the present writ petition, hence, in that view the writ petition is hereby dismissed on account of non impleadment of necessary parties. 3. Any other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J SOURAV /39