SURAT SINGH YADAV AND ANR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR
CRLMP/4054/2015 · 2025-09-16
Ashutosh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22613 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22613 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:37557] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4054/2015
1. Surat Singh Yadav, S/o Shree Prabhati Ram, Age-61 Years,
2. Vimala Yadav, W/o Surat Singh Yadav, Age-60 Years, Both Petitioners Resident of Plot No. 68, Shiv Colony, Hari Marg, Tonk Road, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor.
2. Hari Singh Jatav, S/o Shree Budhiram Jatav, Age-66 Years, R/o-67, Shiv Colony, Hari Marg, Tonk Phatak, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Raj ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv. with Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, Dy. G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 16/09/2025
1. This petition has been filed for quashing of the FIR No. 339/2015 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 323 & 427 of IPC and Section 3(1)(10) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report dated 11.05.2025, which is taken on record.
3. As per the factual report, after investigating the impugned FIR, negative final report has been submitted before the concerned trial Court, therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
[2025:RJ-JP:37557] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4054/2015]
4. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to avail other remedy as available to them under the law.
5. Stay application and all other pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /10