M/S ROURA NON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY (P) LTD v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/9656/2023 · 2025-05-08
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22612 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22612 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:13179 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 9656 of 2023 Decided on : 08.05.2025 M/s Roura Non-Conventional Energy (P) Ltd. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate, for respondents No.5 to 7. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following relief:-
“i) That in view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances, the present writ petition may kindly be allowed and the State authorities may kindly be directed to ensure the smooth work of Roura II 20 MW HEP 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2025:HHC:13179 District Kinnaur at the project site of the petitioner company and the work should not be stalled due to illegal action on the part of respondents No. 5 to 7 and other local residents, in the interest of justice and fair play.”
2. When the matter was listed on 07.12.2023, the following order was passed by the Court:-
“CWP No. 9556 of 2023 and CMP No. 17824 of 2023 Respondent No.5 to 7 stand served. Mr. Nitin Thakur, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No. 5 to 7.
Learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 5 to 7 submits that the said respondents neither are nor shall cause any interference as far as work being executed by the petitioner is concerned. His statement is taken on record. As prayed for, reply be filed within six weeks. List thereafter.”
3. In the light of the stand of respondents No.5 to 7 that they are not causing any interference as far as the work being executed by the petitioner is concerned, this petition is
disposed of with the observation that in future also, said
3 2025:HHC:13179 respondents will not cause any unlawful interference in the functioning of the petitioner-Industry. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
May 08, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)