Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22607 (AP)

Singamshetty satya Phani Kumar, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/21113/2020 · 2025-09-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010318802020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21113/2020 Between: 1. SINGAMSHETTY SATYA PHANI KUMAR,, S/O DURGA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC PVT.EMPLOYEE, R/O H.NO.3-4/1, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, VAKALAPUDI VILLAGE, BEHIND VEDIKA FUNCTION HALL, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA RURAL, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA RURAL, KAKINADA. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER OF P S SARPAVARAM, KAKINADA RURAL, KAKINADA. 5. TEJA T P V A NARASIMHA MURTHY KOPPURUVURI, S/O SRI HARI PRASAD RAO,AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.1-3- 98/A, APPALA SWAMY QUARY BUS STOP, VIDYADHARA PURAM, VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. HARIBABU KOPPURAVURI SRI HARI PRASAD RAO, S/O VENKATA NARASIMHA RAO,AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.1- 3-98/A,APPALA SWAMY QUARY BUS STOP, VIDYADHARA PURAM,VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. PRASAD G VENKATA SATYA PRASAD, S/O PULLAIAH,AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, KAVALI TOWN,KAVALI, NELLORE DISTRICT. 8. FOUR FOLLOWERS OF TEJA, C/O TEJA D.NO.1-3-98/A, APPALA SWAMY QUARY BUS STOP, VIDHYADHARA PURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BRAHMADANDI RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP for home 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate Writ declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 4 in not apprehending the Accused/Respondents 5 to 8 in the light of the F I R No.187 of 2020 of P S Sarpavaram as unlawful arbitrary against the Principals of Natural Justice consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to arrest the accused/ Respondents No 5 6 7 8 forthwith in light of the said F I R No 187/2020 of P S Sarpavaram for the offences U/s 448 323 420 343 384 r/w 34 IPC and Proceed in accordance with the Law” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. As seen from the record, the present petition is filed seeking a direction to the police to arrest the accused in Crime No.187 of 2020 of Sarpavaram Police Station. 4. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. In that view, it is prerogative of the investigation agency to take necessary steps to conclude the investigation and file a report before appropriate Court. Therefore, there are no merits in the petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21113 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr