Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22605 (KAR)

MR THULASI RAM S @ S THULASIRAM v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/4875/2025 · 2025-04-04

Hemant Chandangoudar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14324 CRL.P No. 4875 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4875 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MR. THULASI RAM S @ S THULASIRAM S/O L KRISHNA MANDADI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ADDRESS AS PER FIR: GROUND FLOOR, SRI LAVANYA SERENITY, 6TH MAIN, 13T KORAMANGALA 1ST BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560 034. (AS PER THE AADHAR CARD) NO.1-91, B C COLONY PALASAMUDRAM, CHITTTOR ANDHRA PRADESH - 517 599. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AFROZ PASHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MARATHAHALLI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. SRI. SHANKAR J AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O LATE B JAYARAMA NAIDU, RESIDING AT: NO.181, 18TH MAIN, HSR LAYOUT, 4TH SECTOR, BANGALORE - 560 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL RAI K., HCGP FOR R1) Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: High Court Of Karnatka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14324 CRL.P No. 4875 of 2025 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.708/2024 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE IN MARATHAHALLI P.S., FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 3(5), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) OF BNS, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE 29th ACMM COURT, MAYOHALL, AT BANGALORE CITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER 1. The learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1/State. 2. The petitioner has challenged the registration of the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 3(5), 318(4), 336(3), 338, and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), in Crime No.708/2024 registered by the Marathahalli Police Station. The allegation against the petitioner is that, as a partner, he forged the signature of the complainant and created a letter of authorization. Under the said letter of authorization, he is alleged to have executed a deed of cancellation of the sale deed executed in favour of the firm. Whether the letter of authorization is forged or not is a matter that requires investigation. 3. Therefore, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to proceed with the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14324 CRL.P No. 4875 of 2025 investigation in accordance with law. However, respondent No.1 shall not take any coercive action against the petitioner. 4. The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and shall not be summoned without following due process of law. 5. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court in the event a charge sheet is filed. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE AKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 CT:SK