Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22605 (AP)

COMPANY SECY, M/S. SRI RAYALASEEMA ALKALIES & ALLIED CHEMICA v. SECY, APERC, HYDERABAD & 4 OTHERS

WP/17787/2014 · 2025-07-13

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010318602014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 17787 OF 2014 Between: 1. COMPANY SECY, M/S. SRI RAYALASEEMA ALKALIES & ALLIED CHEMICA, Having Regd Office at Gondiparla Village,Kurnool Dist Rep by its company secretary, sri V.Radhakrishna Murthy R/o. Hyderabad. ...Petitioner AND 1. SECY APERC HYDERABAD, rep. by its Secretary, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad. 2. The Southern Power Distribution Company of A P, Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, Tirupati,Chitoor Dist. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, The Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, at Kurnool. 4. The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation Circle, The Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, at Kurnool. 5. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep, by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Energy Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: J SRINADH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENERGY (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL 2 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. M. Parichaya Reddy, learned Counsel appearing through online representing Sri J. Srinadh Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Ms. A. Jyothi Ratna, learned Counsel appearing for Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota, learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL. 2. Ms. M. Parichaya Reddy, learned Counsel appearing through online representing Sri J. Srinadh Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the cause does not survive in the present Writ Petition. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no Order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this Order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 14.07.2025 JKS 3 51 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 17787 OF 2014 14.07.2025 JKS