Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010282142018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8890/2018 REJINA BEGUM W/O- MUSTAFIZUR RAHMAN, VILL- KALIKAJARI, P.O- NAGABANDHA, P.O- MIKIRVITA, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782106 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. TO BE REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, REVENUE REGISTRATION DEPTT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06 2:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION ASSAM CUM DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS CUM CHAIRMAN PERMANENT SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR SELECTION OF MUSLIM MARRIAGE REGISTRAR AND KAZIZ ASSAM RUPNAGAR GUWAAHATI- 32 3:THE REGISTRAR OF FIRMS AND SOCIETIES HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI- 06 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM HOME DEPTT DISPUR GHY- 06 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM DISTRICT REGISTRAR BARPETA Page No.# 2/3 P.O AND DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781314 6:KAZI AND MUSLIM REGISTRAR AND DIVORCE REGISTRAR BARPETA DR. B K ROAD BARPETA(MUSLIM PATTY P.O- BARPETA DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781314 7:MUSTAFIZUR RAHMAN S/O- LATE MATIUR RAHMAN VILL- DANGARKUCHI P.O- SAUKACHI COLONY DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 78131 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J I BARBHUIYA, MR. L MOHAN,MR. R ALI Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. A R SIKDAR (R7),MD A ALI (R7),MR. S I TALUKDAR (R7),MR M AHMED (R6),MR. A HUSSAIN (R6),SC, REVENUE BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER 18/08/2025 Mr. J I Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner after attempting to argue with the matter at some length, has submitted that he be granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum for assailing the divorce as pronounced in this case by the private respondent No. 7. In view of the above prayer made by Mr. Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without entering into the merits of the matter requires the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for annulment of the divorce as pronounced in her case by the private respondent No. 7. Page No.# 3/3 In the event, any such proceeding is so instituted within a period of 1 (one) month from today, the concerned Court shall consider for the purpose of condoning delay in instituting such proceeding the fact that the present proceeding was pending before this Court w.e.f. 19.12.2018. Mr. A R Sikdar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 7 is present. With the above observations and directions, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant