Murugan v. The State of Tamilnadu, rep by The Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station
WP Crl.(MD)/2193/2025 · 2025-11-26
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 226001 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 226001 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2193 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.P.Crl.(MD).No.2193 of 2025 Murugan
... Petitioner
Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station, Dindigul District. ...Respondent Prayer
: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to provide adequate police protection to petitioner for putting up fencing around petitioner's land situated in Survey No.452/2C2, measuring 3 cents, Nuthulapuram Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District, pursuant to the survey conducted and the order passed by this Court based on the petitioner's representation dated 11.10.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Dineshbabu For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi
Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2193 of 2025 ORDER This Writ Petition is filed for Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.10.2024 and provide adequate police protection to the petitioner for putting up fencing around his land in Survey No.452/2C2 measuring 3 cents, Nuthulapuram Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that survey was conducted on the petitioner's land and the boundaries were marked; that however, a third person is interfering with the fencing of the property; and that there is threat to the petitioner's possession.
3. The person, who is alleged to have prevented the petitioner from fencing the property, is not made a party in this Writ Petition. The respondent cannot interfere in such disputes. If the petitioner is aggrieved by action of any third party, it is open to him to approach the Civil Court. However, if the petitioner's complaint discloses any cognizable offence, the respondent Police may take appropriate action in accordance with law. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2193 of 2025
4. With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 26.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Lm
To 1.The Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station, Dindigul District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2193 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. Lm W.P.Crl.(MD).No.2193 of 2025 26.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis