Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2260 (AP)

S. Kedareswari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/34356/2025 · 2026-09-06

Alapati Giridhar, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (RNT, j & AGD, J W.P.No.34356 of 2025) APHC010665822025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 34356 OF 2025 Between: 1. S. Kedareswari,, W/o. Santha Rao, Aged 35 years, Occ- Pvt. Service, R/o Anjayya Nagar, Behind Medicover Hospital, Sector 6, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi at Velagapudi, Guntur District 2. The Commissioner of Police and Addl District Magistrate, Police Commissionerate, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the 2 (RNT, j & AGD, J W.P.No.34356 of 2025) nature of writ of Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the constitution of India directing the 4th respondent to produce Sri Sigalapalli Kundan, who is now detained in Central Prison, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District before this Honble Court and he may be ordered to be released forthwith after declaring his detention vide C. No.2495/MC-III/PD Act/2025, dt. 04.08.2025, passed by the 2nd respondent whieh was confirmed by the 1st respondent vide G.O.Rt.No. 1788, dt.26.09.2025 General Administration (Law and Order) Dept., as illegal and un constitutional and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order: 3 (RNT, j & AGD, J W.P.No.34356 of 2025) ORDER :-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) Sri B.Madhukar, learned counsel representing Sri K.Purna Chandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 2. Recording the submission as aforesaid, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ____________________ ALAPATI GIRIDHAR, J Date: 07.09.2026 RPD. 4 (RNT, j & AGD, J W.P.No.34356 of 2025) 126 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR (Dismissed as Infructuous) WRIT PETITION NO: 34356 of 2025 Date: 07.09.2026 RPD/KSK.