Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22594 (CHH)

BANSAL ELECTRONICS v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2662/2023 · 2025-01-16

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:2928 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2662 of 2023 1 - Bansal Electronics Through Its Proprietor Govind Bansal, S/o Shri Subhash Bansal, Aged About 40 Years, Church Road, Near Ashwini Chowk, Nawapara, Ambikapur District Surguja, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel, D.K.S. Bhawan Campus, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director And Superintendent Government Medical College AfÏliated Hospital, Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPC No. 2677 of 2023 1 - M/s Kunal Traders Through Its Proprietor Vikas Agrawal, S/o - Late Shri Ved Prakash Agrawal, Aged About- 42 Years, Basant Talkies Road, Agrasen Chowk, Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.01.16 23:59:42 +0530 2 Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel, D.K.S. Bhawan Campus, Raipur, Chhattsigarh. 3 - Joint Director And Superintendent Government Medical College AfÏliated Hospital, Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Ashutosh Shukla, Advocate For Respondent/State :Shri Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 16.01.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking a direction towards the respondents to make payment of the undisputed amount towards the electrical works done by the petitioners. 2. Today the learned counsel for the petitioners on instruction submits that the payment of the undisputed amount has already been released, however, the interest part of the said amount has not been paid to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to approach the 3 appropriate authority for the interest part on the undisputed claim which has been released to the petitioners. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib