Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22588 (RAJ)

SATISH KUMAR MEENA S/O SHRI RUDA RAM MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/217/2025 · 2025-07-11

Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25588-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 217/2025 Satish Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ruda Ram Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Villege Karoda, Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department Of Home, Government Secretariat Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Superintendent Of Police, District Kotputli (Raj.). 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station, Behrod Sadar District Kotputli (Raj.). 5. Mr. Jaypal Singh A.s.i., Police Thana Behror Sadar Kotputali (Raj.) 6. Mr. Jay Singh Saini S/o Shri Ramsing Saini, R/o Dhni Bibiwali, Villege Bardod, Bahrod Kotputli (Raj.)- 301020 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Balaut For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, Addl. G.A. with Mr. Aman Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 11/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at length is not pressing the petition with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law. 2. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. [2025:RJ-JP:25588-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-217/2025] 3. There is no doubt, in the eventuality of the petitioner availing the remedies, the same shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J PAYAL DHAWAN /23