IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL P RADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.939 of 2025 Date of Decision: 05.09.2025 __________________________________________________________________________ Sh. Raj Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus Mr. Nipun Jindal …....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Inderjit Singh Narwal, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate. _________________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 04.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Deputy Divisional Manager, HRTC, Kullu, Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondent, states that sum of 1803935 ₹ /- stands paid to the petitioner on account of leave encashment, DCRG and interest on delayed payment and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds merit in the contention of Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned counsel representing respondent that mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, stands duly complied with. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same are closed, being fully satisfied. Notice is discharged. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner 2 to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate Court of law, qua the surviving grievance, if required and desired. September 05, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge