[2025:RJ-JP:32222] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8118/2025 1. Ramkesh Son Of Shyokaran, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Bandhawal Police Station Bonli District Sawaimadhopur. At Present In District Jail Sawai Madhopur 2. Beerwan @ Vimal Son Of Shyokaran, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Bandhawal Police Station Bonli District Sawaimadhopur. At Present In District Jail Sawai Madhopur ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP, Ms. Swati Sharma for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 18/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.69/2025 registered at Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that prima-facie the offence under Section 110 of BNS is not made out against the petitioners. The injuries sustained to the injured are simple blunt in nature. It is also [2025:RJ-JP:32222] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8118/2025] contended that the cross case was also registered by the petitioners against the complainant's party and the petitioners amicably settled their dispute. The accused-petitioners are in custody since 17.06.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant concedes that the petitioners and the complainant have arrived at compromise and if the bail application of the accused-petitioners is allowed, then he has no objection. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that the injuries sustained to the injured are not dangerous to life, rather found to be simple blunt in nature, therefore, considering the above facts, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Ramkesh Son Of Shyokaran and 2. Beerwan @ Vimal Son Of Shyokaran, in connection with FIR No.69/2025 registered at Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before [2025:RJ-JP:32222] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8118/2025] the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The accused-petitioners are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioners and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioners on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/110