- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14029 WP No. 9580 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 9580 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. BAJARANGI SEVA TRUST (R) A REGISTERED TRUST REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN TRUST ACT, 1881, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT YADIYUR GRAMA, YADIYUR HOBLI, KINIGAL TALUK-572142 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, RAJU PATIL J. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NISHAN G. K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MS BUILDING, VIDHANA VEEDI, BANGALORE-560040. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DC OFFICE, MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA, TUMAKURU - 572101. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TUMAKURU ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), TUMAKURU SUB DIVISION MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA, TUMAKURU-572101. Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14029 WP No. 9580 of 2025 4. TAHASILDHAR, OFFICE OF TAHASILDHAR, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU-572130. 5. REVENUE INSPECTOR, TUMAKURU SUB DIVISION MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA, TUMAKURU - 572101. 6. PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (PDO) OFFICE OF GRAM PANCHAYATH, YADIYUR, TUMAKURU-572101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. MANJUNATH, HCGP FOR R1 TO R5.) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY PETITIONER DTD. 16.02.2024 (ANNX-F) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this Writ Petition is for issuance of a direction to respondent No.4 to consider the representation dated 16.02.2024 by which the petitioner had sought for grant of land. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14029 WP No. 9580 of 2025 2. Learned A.G.A. places on record an endorsement dated 02.04.2025, whereby the request of the petitioner has been considered and rejected. 3. In view of the said endorsement, the prayer of the petitioner would not survive for consideration. This Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. 4. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to challenge the said endorsement. 5. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. SD/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32