- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7366 WP No. 31516 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 31516 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. JANAKI KOTIAN W/O LATE SOMAPPA KUKIAN, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/A PADUBETTU, KULAI POST, HOSABETTU, MANGALORE TALUK, MANGALORE DISTRICT-575 019. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DILRAJ JUDE ROHIT SEQUEIRA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANGALORE, PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZEN FOR MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MANGALORE, MANGALORE DISTRICT-575 008. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MANGALORE SUB-DIVISION, PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZEN FOR MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE TRIBUNAL, MANGALORE MANGALORE DISTRICT-575 008. 3. RAVINDRA SOMAPPA KUKIAN S/O LATE SOMAPPA KUKIAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/A PADUBETTU, KULAI POST, HOSABETTU, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7366 WP No. 31516 of 2019 MANGALORE TALUK, MANGALORE DISTRICT-575 019. 4. SMT.SHALINI W/O RAVINDRA SOMAPPA KUKIAN, R/A PADUBETTU, KULAI POST, HOSABETTU, MANGALORE TALUK, MANGALORE DISTRICT-575 019. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS KUMAR.M., HCGP FOR R1 & 2; SRI. DEEPAK., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A.KESHAVA BHAT., ADVOCATE FOR R3 & 4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen form the daily order sheet, petition was listed on 18.02.2025, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 19.02.2025. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7366 WP No. 31516 of 2019 The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25