Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2256 (CHH)

SMT. JYOTI BANDARU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/123/2024 · 2025-04-04

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15875 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 123 of 2024 1 - Smt. Jyoti Bandaru W/o Shri B.C.H. Raju Aged About 46 Years R/o Sector - 2, Infront Of Tiwari Dairy, Shivanand Nagar, Shrinagar, Khamtarai, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House Officer (S.H.O.) P.S. Khamtarai, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Asit Mohan Banerjee S/o Shri Late Abin Mohan Banerjee Aged About 75 Years R/o House No, 11/44, Sector-2, Near Tiwari Dairy, Shivanand Nagar, P.S. - Khamtarai, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Balraj Gupta, Advocate For Respondent/State For Respondent No.2 : : Mr. S.S.Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 04/04/2025 Heard Mr. Balraj Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.S.Baghel, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate appearing 2 for respondent No1/State and Ms. Vidhi Matlani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate appearing for respondent No.2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash the impugned FIR against the petitioner pursuant to impugned FIR and subsequent charge sheet (P/1) bearing Crime No. 692/2021 for the offences punishable under Section 420 IPC at PS Khamtarai, District Raipur (CG) against the petitioner which is pending as Cr.Cs. No. 18783/2022 before the JMFC, Raipur (CG) titled as State Vs. Jyoti Bandaru be also be quashed in the interest of justice accordingly.” 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the charges have been filed against the applicant on 3.11.2023 and the same has not been challenged in the present petition. 3. Considering the the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the law, if aggrieved by the charge- sheet and order framing charge. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.04.04 17:02:21 +0530