Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22550 (RAJ)

GRANDEUR ELEVATORS LLP v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9789/2025 · 2025-07-12

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25793] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9789/2025 Grandeur Elevators Llp, Through Partner Shri Kamal Agarwal, Resident Of Plot No.-Cn-152, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Nagar-C, Village Gajsinghpura, Badarwas, Gopalpura Byepass, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Power And Energy, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Chairman Cum Managing Director, Jvvnl, Vidhyut Bhawan Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. 3. The Executive Engineer (A-Ii), Jaipur Discom, Bhankrota, Jaipur. 4. Assistant Engineer (A-Ii), Bhankrota, Jaipur Discom, Bhankrota, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.K. Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/07/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an online application was submitted by the petitioner before the respondents for issuing the electricity connection at his residential premises i.e., Plot No.-CN-152, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Nagar-C, Village Gajsinghpura, Badarwas, Gopalpura Byepass, Jaipur. It is submitted that Rule 3 of Electricity (Right to Consumer) Rules, 2020 provides that after receiving the application for supply of electricity connection, distribution licensee is under obligation to ensure the supply of electricity at the desire place. It is submitted that no action has been taken on the application filed by the [2025:RJ-JP:25793] (2 of 2) [CW-9789/2025] petitioner despite the fact that respondents are duty bound under section 43 of the Electricity Act to provide electricity connection within a period of one month after receiving the application. Counsel submits that in these circumstances, legal notice was also served upon the respondents in the month of May’2025 but till date, neither application has been decided nor electricity connection has been provided to the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to direct the respondents to pass a reasoned/speaking order on notice for demand of justice sent by the petitioner on 08.05.2025 within a period of one month from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. Respondents are further directed to intimate the petitioner about the decision taken on notice for demand of justice. With the aforesaid directions, this civil writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and pending application(s) (if any) also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /30