Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22545 (GAU)

SIDDHARTHA DEB ROY v. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. AND ANR

WP(C)/8822/2018 · 2025-01-19

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010283862018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8822/2018 SIDDHARTHA DEB ROY 2ND LINK ROAD, LANE NO. 4, H NO. 35/11, SILCHAR, PIN- 788001 VERSUS BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. AND ANR A GOVT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGD OFFICE AT HARISH CHANDRA MATHUR LANE, JANPATH, NEW DELHI- 110001, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN 2:ASSTT GM (ADMN) GM TELECOM DEPTT BSNL SILCHAR SSA PIN- 78800 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS M HAZARIKA, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, BSNL, MR. Y DOLOI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 20.01.2025 Ms. M. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, during Page No.# 2/2 the pendency of the present writ petition, the issue involved has become in fructuous. Accordingly, she prays that the writ petition be dismissed as having become infructuous. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed, as having become infructuous. Interim orders passed, if any, shall stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant