THE VYALIKAVAL HOUSE BUILDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD v. SMT. PARVATHI NARAYANAN
WP/11122/2025 · 2025-04-15
H T Narendra Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22544 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22544 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15490 WP No. 11122 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11122 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
THE VYALIKAVAL HOUSE BUILDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO. 100, 11TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE- 560003 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. M. MAHADEV SWAMY A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE MYSORE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1959.
2.
SRI. M. MAHADEV SWAMY S/O MADAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS DIRECTOR, THE VYALIKAVAL HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO. 100, 11TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE- 560003 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. LEKHANA JAIN, ADVCOATE FOR SRI. SIDDHARTH SUMAN., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. PARVATHI NARAYANAN W/O ANANTHA NARAYAN AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS NO. 348, 11TH MAIN ROAD 66TH CROSS, RAJAJINAGAR 5TH BLOCK, BENGALURU- 560010. …RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER DATED 15.03.2025 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15490 WP No. 11122 of 2025
LXXXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL COURT, BENGALURU, (CCH 86) IN COM EX NO. 3496/2017 ON APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 11 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FILED BY THE RESPONDENT FOR ARREST OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE JDR SOCIETY (THE PETITIONER HEREIN) (AND TO CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN THE HONBLE TRIAL COURT IN COM EX NO. 3496/2017) AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER
1. The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 15.04.2025, stating that, in view of subsequent events, the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, they seek leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
HA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10