1/5 CRL OP No. 29367 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP No. 29367 of 2025 S.S.Kirubakaran Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police, CCB, Team XV, Chennai. Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under section 528 of BNSS to direct the Learned CCB and CBCID Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, to dispose of the CC 4630 of 2023, on its file within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Kingsly Solomon For Respondent: Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the learned CCB and CBCID Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, to dispose of C.C.No.4630 of 2023, on its file within the time stipulated by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5 CRL OP No. 29367 of 2025 2.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that there are totally 15 witnesses in this case, out of whom, 2 have been examined and the case stands posted on 10.12.2025 for further progress. 3.The Apex Court in the case of Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi Vs. The State of Maharashtra in Criminal Appeal No.4758 of 2024 dated 25.11.2024, has observed that the High Courts are fixing time-bound schedule for conclusion of trial in a routine manner, despite the decision of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2024) 6 SCC 267, which reads as under: “47.3. constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other courts. Constitutional courts may issue directions for the time- bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts concerned where the cases are pending.“ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5 CRL OP No. 29367 of 2025 4.However, taking into consideration the fact that there are only 13 more witnesses, the learned Trial Judge is directed to dispose of C.C.No.4630 of 2023, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one (1) year from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 29-10-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No sli To 1.The CCB and CBCID Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. 2.The Inspector of Police, CCB, Team XV, Chennai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5 CRL OP No. 29367 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5 CRL OP No. 29367 of 2025 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J. sli CRL OP No. 29367 of 2025 29-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis