Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22541 (KAR)

SMT S R TULASIMATHA, v. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR

WP/9874/2025 · 2025-06-06

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19160 WP NO.9874 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.9874 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. S.R. TULASIMATHA W/O DR. SIDDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1833/2, NEAR DYSP OFFICE, B.M. ROAD, HUNUSUR TOWN, NIZAM MOHALLA, KALKUNIKE, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 105. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARSHITH V., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. VEENA J. KAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR SATHANUR VILLAGE AND HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 126. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION, RAMANAGAR - 562 159. 3. THE TAHSILDAR SATHANUR VILLAGE AND HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 126. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19160 WP NO.9874 OF 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER DATED 07TH MAY, 2024 AND 19TH JUNE, 2024 VIDE ANNEXURES 'A' AND 'A1' RESPECTIVELY FILED FOR CHANGE OF KHATHA INTO THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE LAND IN QUESTION FORTHWITH; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Smt. Navya Shekhar, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent-Authorities to consider the representations dated 07th May, 2024 (Annexure-A) and 19th June, 2024 (Annexure-A1), seeking change of Khatha into her name pursuant to the judgment and decree dated 20th March, 2024 passed by this Court in Regular First Appeal No.1929 of 2012. 3. Heard Sri. Harshith V., learned counsel on behalf of Smt. Veena J. Kamath, appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Navya Shekhar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19160 WP NO.9874 OF 2025 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration to the averments made in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the representations made by the petitioner dated 07th May, 2024 (Annexure-A) and 19th June, 2024 (Annexure-A1) in terms of the judgment and decree dated 20th March, 2024 (Annexure-D) passed by this Court in Regular First Appeal No.1929 of 2012, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33