Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2254 (GAU)

SMTI RINA SAHA v. SRI JITEN KALITA

I.A.(Civil)/4021/2025 · 2026-02-03

Mitali Thakuria

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010195972024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/4021/2025 in RFA/76/2025 SMTI RINA SAHA D/O LATE RAKHAL CH SAHA W/O SRI NEPAL CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF WARD NO 7 BARPETA ROAD TOWN ARANYAK PO AND PS BARPETA ROAD DISTRICT BARPETA ASSAM PIN 781315 VERSUS SRI JITEN KALITA S/O PRATAP KALITA RESIDENT OF TIHU PO TIHU PS NALBARI DISTRICT NALBARI ASSAM PIN 781335 2:SRI PRAHLAD ARJYA ALIAS SARKAR S/O LATE DHIREN ARJYA RESIDENT OF WARD NO 8 BARPETA TOWN ROAD PO AND PS BARPETA ROAD DIST BARPETA ASSAM PIN 781315 3:MOZIBOR RAHMAN Page No.# 2/3 RESIDENT OF KHEIRABARI PO AND PS BARPETA ROAD DIST BARPETA ASSAM PIN 781315 4:SAMSUL HAQUE RO BERPETA TARANI SANGHA DIST BARPETA ASSAM PIN 781301 ------------ Advocate for : MD A RAHMAN Advocate for : appearing for SRI JITEN KALITA BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard Mr. S. Das, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant. This application has been filed by the applicant praying for stay of the execution of the decree dated 15.06.2024, passed by the learned Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) at Barpeta in Title Suit No. 54/2014 decreeing the Counter-Claim of the respondents/defendants. It is submitted by Mr. Das that they have already preferred an appeal against the judgment and decree dated 15.06.2024, passed by the learned Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) at Barpeta in Title Suit No. 54/2014 decreeing the Counter-Claim and for the dismissal of the case of the present appellant. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, let the execution of the decree dated 15.06.2024, passed by the learned Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) at Barpeta in Title Suit No. 54/2014 Page No.# 3/3 decreeing the Counter-Claim of the respondents/defendants be stayed till disposal of the connected appeal. With the above observation, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant