[2025:RJ-JP:34261] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8181/2025 Manoj Kumar S/o Shree Madanlal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near Ramdev Ji Temple, Regar Mohalla, Rased Thana Paroli, District Bhilwara Rajasthan ( At Present Judicial Custody In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/08/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Manoj Kumar S/o Shree Madanlal in FIR No. 07/2025 dated 27.03.2025 registered at P.S. Cyber Police Station District -Kota City, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 318(4) of BNS and 66D of IT Act. 2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He also submits that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. [2025:RJ-JP:34261] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8181/2025] 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that allegation upon petitioner is that his account has been used for purpose of cheating. He further submitted that petitioner is not involved in cyber criminal activity directly or indirectly and he has not received any money out of transaction or loss caused to anyone. He also referred grant of bail to Danish on 24.06.2025 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court and submitted that the case of petitioner is on better footings than Danish. He also referred police investigation and submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 7. On the basis of complaint lodged by Samlam and Nagma Ali about cyber crime and fraud the matter is investigated by police. The police has identified role of present petitioner and Daniesh and after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed against them but kept pending against other accused Brijesh, Rakesh and others under Section 193(9) of BNSS. The petitioner Daniesh was granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 24.06.2025. The petitioner is in custody since 01.06.2025. There is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. [2025:RJ-JP:34261] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8181/2025] The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Manoj Kumar S/o Shree Madanlal, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /96