AJAYPAL SON OF DEENBANDHU v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8199/2025 · 2025-09-01
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22534 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22534 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35058] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8199/2025 Ajaypal Son Of Deenbandhu, Resident Of Shyamu Ka Gher, Police Station Diholi, Dholpur ( Presently Confined In Jail At Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 01/09/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.184/2025 registered at Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4) & 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Sections 3 & 10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2022. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4) & 61(2) of BNS and Sections 3 & 6 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2022.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged
[2025:RJ-JP:35058] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8199/2025] offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that similar situated co-accused Mohit Sharma has already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 02.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; co-accused Mohit Sharma has been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Ajaypal Son Of Deenbandhu shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to
[2025:RJ-JP:35058] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8199/2025] which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /289