[2025:RJ-JP:25799] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10210/2025 Shri Abdul Sattar Son Of Shri Chand Mohammad, Aged About 71 Years, Resident Of Noor Basti, Andarkot, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forests, Aranyabhawan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. The Regional Forest Officer, Forest Department, Ajmer 4. The District Forest Officer, Forest Department, Jaipur. 5. The Divisional Conservator Of Forest, Forest Department, Jaipur. 6. The Assistant Conservator Of Forest, Forest Department Jaipur. 7. The District Collector, District Ajmer Rajasthan 8. The Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Ajmer, Rajasthan 9. The Superintendent Of Police, District Ajmer, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Syed Saadat Ali with Mr. Nadeem Qadeer Ms. Uzma Ilyas Ms. Aafreen Rizvi Mr. Aatif Aman HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/07/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in possession of the land in question from past five decades. It is submitted that on 01.04.2025, a notice was served upon the petitioner wherein he was directed to remove the alleged [2025:RJ-JP:25799] (2 of 2) [CW-10210/2025] encroachment. Thereafter, petitioner submitted his reply to the said notice on 22.04.2025 but without taking into consideration the reply/documents submitted by the petitioner, respondents are hell bent to demolish the residence of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with direction to the respondents to pass a reasoned order on the reply/representation filed by the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. It is further directed that respondents will intimate the petitioner about fate of the representation by proper means. In case, representation of the petitioner is rejected, respondents are directed to grant at least four weeks’ time to the petitioner to avail legal remedy before taking any coercive action. Till decision on the representation, respondent authorities are directed to maintain status quo with regard to the property in question. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and pending application(s) (if any) also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /31