Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22522 (RAJ)

SONU SON OF SHRI MADAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/215/2025 · 2025-07-21

Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27056-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 215/2025 Sonu Son Of Shri Madan, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Govindgarh, Tehsil Govindgarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. Superintendent Of Police, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj.) 4. S.H.O. Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan). 5. Balveer Singh Son Of Shri Buddha Ram, Resident Of Village Punay, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg (Raj.) 6. Pappu Son Of Buddha Ram, Resident Of Village Punay, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg (Raj.) 7. Hukam Son Of Buddha Ram, Resident Of Village Punay, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Tiwari for Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary,GA-cum-AAG Mr. Sudesh Saini, AGA Mr. Kishan Lal, ASI Police Station- Govindgarh, Alwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 21/07/2025 1. This petition in the nature of Habeas Corpus was filed for production of the detenue claimed to be wife of the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:27056-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-215/2025] 2. Report dated 20.07.2025 filed by learned GA-cum-AAG is taken on record. 3. The statement of the detenue has been annexed with the report wherein it has been stated that the detenue is willing to live with her parents. 4. In view of the statement, no further order is called for. The petition is disposed of as infructuous. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/29