2025:HHC:26796 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 12829 of 2025 Decided on : 08.08.2025 Narender Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Roop Lal Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents-State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to the State. 2. Without going into the controversy raised in this writ petition, as this Court is of the considered view that private disputes cannot be agitated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as the same apparently amounts to abuse of the process of law, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the complaints that have 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:26796 been filed with the Authorities by the petitioner, be taken to their logical conclusion, in accordance with law. However, it is clarified that passing of this order will not confer any right upon the petitioner to again invoke the writ jurisdiction of the Court. If the petitioner is not satisfied with the action of the Authorities, the petitioner may approach appropriate Fora for redressal of his grievance. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, in above- said terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 08, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)