Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010285032018 2025:GAU-AS:1298 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8856/2018 BINAPANI DAS AND 2 ORS. W/O. LT. ARJUN RAM DAS, D/O. LT. GARGO RAM DAS, R/O. WARD NO.8, P.O. DHEKIAJULI, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM-784110. 2: SANKAR DAS S/O. LT. GARGO RAM DAS R/O. WARD NO.8 P.O. DHEKIAJULI DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM-784110. 3: PRADIP DAS S/O. LT. GARGO RAM DAS R/O. WARD NO.8 P.O. DHEKIAJULI DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM-784110 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER SONITPUR DISTRICT P.O. TEZPUR PIN-784001. 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER Page No.# 2/3 DHEKIAJULI REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. DHEKIAJULI DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM-784110. 4:SMT. LABANYA DAS W/O. LT. KAMAKHYA PRASAD DAS VILL. SIPAJHAR P.O. GHARUA DIST. DARRANG ASSAM-784145. 5:SMTI. ANJALI DAS W/O LATE KESHAB CH. DAS R/O VILL. KUMAR HATI BARPETA TOWN P.O. AND P.S. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. 6:SMTI. KUNJALATA DAS THAKURIA W/O LATE ATUL THAKURIA R/O VILL. PASCHIM CHAMATA SALOIPARA P.O. AND P.S. NALBARI DIST. NALBARI ASSAM. 7:SMTI. BANI DAS KAKOTI W/O SRI PRAFULLA KAKOTI R/O VILL. DORAKAHARA P.O. AND P.S. BAIHATA DIST. KAMRUP (R) ASSAM. 8:SMTI. DIPALI DAS DEKA W/O SRI PHANIDHAR DEKA R/O NO. 2 MATHGHARIA HOUSE NO 7 P.O. NOONMATI GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MR. A DAS,MR. I HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P S DEKA (SC, REVENUE), MR. H MAZUMDER (R-4),MR. Page No.# 3/3 N BORAH (R-4),MR. A IKBAL (R-5 to R-8),MR. A I AHMED (R-5 to R-8),MR. R BARUAH (R-5 to R-8) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 07.02.2025 Ms. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. A. Bhattacharya, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department of the respondent no. 1; Mr. J. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3; Mr. N. Borah, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4; and Ms. J. Sarma, learned counsel representing Mr. A. Ikbal, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 5 to 8 are present. Both Mr. Borah, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and Mr. Ikbal, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 5 to 8 have reiterated their submissions made earlier on 27.01.2025, that the dispute existing earlier between the petitioners and the private respondents has already been amicably settled. Ms. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioners who was asked to obtain instructions, on 22.01.2025 and on 27.01.2025, as regards the submissions made by the learned counsel for the private respondents regarding amicable settlement of the matter, has submitted that though contact was made with the petitioners from her end no definite instruction is forthcoming. Ms. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that, at this stage, the writ petition may be allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and in view of the submission as regards projected amicable settlement, this writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty. JUDGE Comparing Assistant